Reaserch Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Reaserch Critique - Essay ExampleHowever the investigate fails to mention the causative agent of pressure sensation ulcer and only d rise ups on the prevention measures.The purpose of the research is intelligibly stated as to assess the quality of disease prognostic in home health care. This is done by looking into process and procedure employ to assess pressure ulcer risk of exposure upon admission to home care, frequency with proper timing f risk reassessment and the various interventions used by home health care agencies to prevent pressure ulcer development.By developing a three check twenty nine item questionnaire, the research question was well applied. Questions were classified in three parts a move aimed at exhausting any important research material. With part one carrying questions with items related to agency size and respondent, part two covering questions on admission on risk appraisal processes and procedures and lastly, part three covering questions on preventi on policies and prevention interventions it comes out clearly that the research question heading was well applied. Both provision of fixed responses and open-ended response options were well applied a thing that produced better results.The researcher had a well laid outline where the action of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) published clinical practice guidelines on pressure ulcer prediction and prevention. The contents of the guidelines were specified with practice recommendations for identifying those people at risk, maintaining and improving tissue tolerance to pressure, protecting against pressure friction and also the use of education to reduce pressure ulcer occurrence.The appraisal was well suppose where health care is evaluated through process of care and outcome indicators. It takes a wider go off on the unscathed efforts undertaken in the prevention of pressure ulcers. (Bergquist, 2004) The two processes above have been developed through literature review, revie w of clinical guidelines,